"We have maintained a silence closely resembling stupidity" - Neil Roberts

Until we have legislation adopted into law to ensure fiduciary accountability and transparency in public affairs we will continue to have human rights breached because the existing crown immunity and lack of any independent oversight invites corruption to flourish.

"Question authority, and think for yourself" - Timothy Leary

"We have maintained a silence closely resembling stupidity" - Neil Roberts

"Information is the currency of democracy" - Thomas Jefferson

‎"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever does." - Margaret Mead

"The truth is like a lion, you don't have to defend it. Let it loose, it will defend itself."

"I = m c 2 [squared] where "I" am information" - Timothy Leary

"Ring the bells that still can ring, forget your perfect offering, there's a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in." Leonard Cohen

"The internet is a TV that watches you"

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Nga Waiata - Paul Thorn

Paul Thorn, the unofficial poet laureate of Tupelo, Mississippi -

Monday, April 2, 2012

High Court Application for section 84 Judicial Inquiry:

Two corrupt Carterton Constables arrested me on 4th March 2011 for not appearing in the Wellington Court for a minor fixture after WINZ declined to assist me with travel costs to get to Porirua to attend two appointments with psychiatrists, one of whom was 'Dr' Brenda Sally Rimkeit. WINZ refused the applications (in writing) on the grounds that "Work and Income cannot be seen to be assisting people who do not abide by the law."  ALL the appointments should have been made in Masterton - a fact later acknowledged by the Court.

The WINZ decision is obviously in blatant disregard to the established cornerstone of justice for centuries that a person is to be considered innocent until proven guilty! Two psychiatric reports were required by the Court, following one report written by eminent psychiatrist Dr Justin Barry-Walsh in November 2010, in which Dr Barry-Walsh says:
"I do not think this woman is suffering from any mental disorder, and in particular I don't think she is suffering from the onset of persecutory delusions."
Following my arrest I was pushed and shoved and groped by Dallinger and Wilton, and then locked in a cell in the Masterton police station, as Wilton and Dallinger delighted in telling me how they'd waited till after the Judge went home to arrest me.  The following day, Saturday, I was taken before a Justice of the Peace, ONE Justice of the Peace. I explained that my attendance had been excused by Judge Barry because the reports had not been completed and that Judge Barry had agreed with me only days earlier that the appointments should have been made in Masterton not Porirua, like the appointment with Dr Barry-Walsh had been.  Judge Davidson ignored this and ordered that I be sent to prison, and I was taken to Arohata Prison, strip searched, processed and locked up.  Judge Davidson is the same Judge who corruptly presided over the matter involving local prostitute Rachel Betteridge and her partner sending me threatening and abusive messages, and the corrupt local police charged ME with sending messages to HER - despite all the evidence to the contrary!  (I was acquitted, but Davidson was clearly corrupt and refused to award me costs or acknowledge that the police had never attempted to communicate with the telecommunications company, Vodafone, and had LIED to the Court in claiming that they had.

The following Monday I was taken to the Wellington Court, but the amicus curiae assigned to the matter (the corruptly laid charges of Perverting the Course of Justice and Escaping From Custody), Bryan Yeoman, didn't turn up, so I was taken back to the prison and brought back the following day.

On Tuesday 8th March I was taken back to Wellington Court, where I was visited in the Court cells by Yeoman and 'Dr' Brenda Sally Rimkeit, an American woman, who conspired with Yeoman, and wrote a certificate saying that in her opinion I needed to be locked up in a mental facility to have the reports completed! Judge Davidson supported this corrupt conspiracy, and as a result of this I eventually ended up locked in two mental asylums for a total of three months. While I was there I learned that Yeoman and others specialise in exploiting vulnerable mental health clients, with the co-operation of and corrupt "psychiatrists" like Drs Brenda Sally Rimkeit, Jacqueline Short, Sarah Romans, Gary Orr and others. A series of lawyers refused to do anything constructive about the scandalous situation, or refused to listen to my instructions about what to do about it, so I was finally forced to write my own application for a Judicial Inquiry under section 84 of the Mental Health Act.

I sat up in my cell at Rangipapa late into the night writing this out by hand, and then waited till there was an honest member of staff on duty to fax it to the Court. This in itself wasn't easy because I was being forcibly medicated with drugs designed to induce the effect of a chemical lobotomy and reduce well functional people to vegetative states, then there was the Management Plans of the doctors and nurses which stipulated that I wasn't allowed any phone calls or mail, pens, paper, copies of legislation, etc. Eventually I managed to contact friends who sent me writing materials, and after spitting out the medication that wasn't being forcibly injected, wrote the Application for Judicial Inquiry myself, late into the night after we were locked in our cells.

The Application named the Capital Coast Health Board and the Attorney General as Co-Respondents, and eventually resulted in my release, together with the support of a number of people in the community, who phoned, wrote letters of complaint, swore affidavits, came to Court and gave evidence, protested, signed a petition, and took a lot of other action to protest this scandalous abuse of powers and outright blatant corruption. Here is the Application for Judicial Review, and I urge others to take similar action if faced with the same corruption, first make application under section 16 for a judicial review, and if that fails, read section 84, and apply for a Judicial Inquiry. Of course, this is assuming you can get hold of a pen and paper, let alone copies of the legislation - phone a lawyer and instruct them in writing to get you a pen and paper and copies of the relevant legislation (the Mental Health Act and the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act), then instruct the lawyer in writing to make the two applications under sections 16 and then 84:

To Fax: (04) 914 3603 URGENT 19 April 2011
From Fax: (04) 918 2562 Rangipapa Unit, Porirua Hospital

To the High Court at Wellington:

May it please the Court:
I, Katherine Raue, wish to make an urgent application under section 84(2) and section 84(3) of the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment Act 1992 to be brought before a Judge for examination and on the evidence of other witnesses, for the purpose of a Judicial Inquiry to establish that I am fit to be discharged from the hospital, (section 84(3)(b)).

I respectfully request that the Court consider such evidence as the attached affidavit from Witness X, and other documents, including several psychiatric reports and letters from lawyers relevant to this matter, and the evidence of several witnesses, including Witness X.

Judge DRW Barry of the District Court has already acknowledged that there are serious factual inaccuracies in at least one of the recent reports prepared for the Court. At a recent fixture in the Masterton Court Judge Barry acknowledged that reference to " a previous pattern" of involvement with police when she lived in Wellington" (report of Dr Justin Barry-Walsh, November 2009, and attributed to Constable Peter Cunningham) was erroneous and significantly misleading in that I had not lived in Wellington for about thirty years, and had had next to nothing to do with police all my life until having the misfortune to come to Carterton in 1999 and meet Constable Cunningham, who told Dr Barry-Walsh (and anyone else who will listen) this orchestrated litany of lies.

Judge Barry also acknowledged evidence from a number of lawyers which included a letter from one which stated that it was "obvious that you have been a lightning rod for Police attention since you arrived in the Wairarapa, and that has resulted in many unnecessary charges being laid and this was most unfair to you." This particular letter commented that the lawyer writing it (Ken Daniels) was pleased at the dismissal of a number of charges against me and that it was obvios that there had been no evidence to support them from the outset and they should not have been laid. Other letters from lawyers comment strongly on the refusal of Police take statements or formal complaints from me on a large number of valid matters including several matters directly relevant to the current charges against me. Police themselves have admitted repeatedly refusing to take complaints when questioned about it in Court.

I also wish to respectfully request a review or Judicial Inquiry or an Appeal of the recent decision of District Court Judge B Davidson's finding under Section 9 of the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003. With respect to Judge Davidson, it is perfectly clear that there is NOT sufficient evidence, on the balance of probabilities, to establish that I caused the act that forms the basis of the offence with which I am charged. For your ease of reference I attach the wirness statements, and transcript of the Depositions Hearing.

If I may draw your attention to the transcript of the Depositions Hearing, page 7 (also marked 12 in the upper right hand corner for some reason), refering to the numbers in the left hand margin, at (5) or thereabouts the principal Crown witness states that he "took no notice at the time" of what I was saying.

At (15) or thereabouts he states that he has ADHD and forgets things (ADHD is a mental disorder as far as I understand it).

At (20) or thereabouts the witness is again asked what it is thatI am alleged to have said to him and his response is: "She goes to me, she says - I don't know, it's gone."

And at (30) the witness agrees that he hasn't got a clue what I said to him basically. The matter should not have proceeded beyond Depositions let alone the Section 9 hearing!

Briefly, the background to this matter is that on 11th February 2009 I was attacked in my home by the Crown witness in the matter of the alleged Perverting the Course of Justice, Michael Francis Murphy, and others. Police refused to even take a statement from me regarding this violent attack, let alone charge Mr Murphy. The attack was in response to - or rather, a result of - Mr Murphy finding out that I had raised concerns of child abuse and violence involving him to the local police - another matter the Wairarapa police have refused to investigate.

Three totally independent witnesses to this attack on 11 February 2009 all rang emergency seriveces on 111 as they witnessed the violent attack as it was taking place, but despite this, Police refused to take a statement from me, or from two of the witnesses. I then requested the audiotape of the 111 call made by one of the witnesses, and Police refused to provide it. After complaining to the Ombudsmen I received a computer disk containing 46 Police radio tracks, including the call to 111 from the third witness, who I had been unaware of prior to receiving the disk, which also contained a number of other tracks which were potentially very embarrassing to the police as well as incriminating Mr Murphy.

Shortly after Police became aware that I had this disk (about two months after the attack) I arrived home one day and caught Murphy stealing a satchel containing the disk and some documents. I immediately rang police and made a signed statement to Constable Laura Rhymer, which was recorded in her notebook.

If I may draw your attention to page 12 of transcript of the the Depositions hearing (17 in the top right hand corner) reference is made to a statement allegedly taken a coule of hours later, also by Constable Rhymer, from Crown witness Aaron Brook (who can't remember what it is I am alleged to have said to him because of his ADHD).

This statement was NOT recorded in Constable Rhymer's notebook - and nor was it included in the Disclosure to the defence (me). I was unaware of its existence until that moment, half way through Constable Rhymer's evidence at the Depositions hearing.

Page 12 paragraph (20) Murphy's evidence alleges that he didn't go to my house since Christmas 2008 except for a couple of occasions "when we were friends" (page one of the transcript). - I specifically asked the amicus curiae - ex police officer Bryan Yeoman - to question Murphy closely about the attack on 11 February 2009, but Yeoman refused to do so.

Dr Brenda Sally Rimkeit wrote a certificate to the Court stating that in her opinion I needed to be detained in a psychiatric institution to have assessments done to see if I am fit to stand trial.

Judge DRW Barry had accepted my explanation only a few weeks earlier that the only reason I had failed to attend two earlier appointments was because they had been made in Porirua when they should have been made in Masterton (as the one in November 2009, with Dr Barry-Walsh had been), and also, I had been unable to attend the appointments at Porirua because I had received one days notice in one case and three days in the other case, and that WINZ had refused to assist me with travel costs on the grounds that "Work and Income cannot be seen to assist clients who do not abide by the law."!

Surely this is a breach of the cornerstone of justice for centuries, that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty! I was unable to attend Court in Wellington on 28 February 2011 for the same reason,and mistakenly thought my attendance had been excused on that day, pending the completion of the psychiatric reports.

I explained this reason for my non attendance for the two recent appointments to Dr Rimkeit, but she refused to accept it (unlike Judge Barry) and the amicus refused to explain it to Judge Davidson, who didn't allow me to speak.

Dr Rimkeit's report to the District Court, dated 22 March 2011 states on page 9: "My concern that (sic) if she proceeds to represent herself at Court she may, through her delusional belief system falsely accuse certain parties of wrongdoing."

Dr Rimkeit's belief is that I suffer from "Delusional Disorder." Even if she was correct (I do not agree) this is not a major mental disorder, and I do not pose a danger to myself or anyone else. Just because I hold the view that the Police - certain specific police officers, not all police I hasten to add, are/have not treated me fairly, does not necessarily mean that I an delusional.

Dr Rimkeit's report and others contain a large number of factual inaccuracies. Just one example of this is the last paragraph of page 8 of her report, continued on page 9, where Dr Rimkeit goes on about the "headmaster of the local school in Carterton that she was fired from being paid off or bribed . . . " and something about a car. I clearly stated to her an entirely factual account about receiving a letter from the Board of Trustees of the school, sacking me because, according to the letter, the Board had recently received information from the local Police that I had "recently been charged with an offence involving a child."

I have never in my life been charged with any such offence! The writers of the letter are delusional, not me!

Dr Rimkeit raised the proposition that the Principal's new car had anything to do with the matter, I merely said it was a coincidence, and only after she asked me if I thought he was bribed with the car. She also mentions suicide in the third paragraph on that page - I have never EVER attempted or even intended to commit suicide, I have never planned or threatened to. I have repeatedly requested that discussions between me and the psychiatrists are recorded by audio or video and these requests have been continually refused.

The reports appear to be an orchestrated litany of lies, bearing no resemblance to fact, almost every paragraph containing significant FACTUAL inaccuracies, as opposed to matters of opinion.

My main concern is that any subsequent reports will take the inaccurate reports into account and be therefore tainted. My only involvement with mental health services previously was to request a referral from my GP to the "To Be Heard" program. This program assists people who feel they aren't being listened to (by Police etc) as I was/am suffering from depression (moderate).

Upon admission to Rangipapa, and on the orders of Dr Rimkeit - my "responsible clinician" the four medications prescribed by my GP were abruptly ceased, causing serious side effects.

I am not psychotic, or delusional. Witness X, my landlady, will give evidence that a rock larger than my head was thrown through the window of the "granny flat" I occupy at her address very recently. I did not imagine this, or the attack on 11th February 2009. I identified Michael Murphy at the time the rock was thrown, as did the three independent witnesses to the attack on 11 February 2009, and again Police have refused to charge him. Crown witness Aaron Brook has stated repeatedly that he saw Murphy in the near vicinity when I cought him burgling my house in April 2009.

Aaron Brook's evidence is consistent in that regard, unlike his evidence against me. Mr Brook came to my house and volunteered this information. I did not ever suggest that he tell Police anything whatsoever apart from what he actually told me he witnessed. His statements (witness statement, Depositions statement) and the Depositions transcript are very vague indeed about the crime I am alleged to have committed, saying that he "felt" I wanted him to lie.

I respectfully submit that Aaron Brook is more delusional than I am, or at best he is simply mistaken, or misunderstood what I said.

The section 9 Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003 matter was not properly addressed if it was addressed at all. The amicus curiae told Judge Davidson that the Depositions hearing had established that the Court was satisfied of my involvement in the offence, but I respectfully submit that this was not the case and the amicus knows that perfectly well.

I am not a lawyer, but have developed an interest in the law and would like to continue legal studies (I passed introduction to law). I am currently being detained in a secure mental facility, having not been convicted of an offence, and have been for over eight weeks. I am not being permitted any incoming or outgoing phone calls or visits except from lawyers, and not permitted any incoming or outgoing mail I was told today.

For over two weeks I was detained in conditions that were frankly appalling - isolation, no excercise, sunlight, company or stimulus, although as I write this I am now in the "main ward" again and conditions are improved slightly.

While in the seclusion ward I had very limited access to my property, including basic items such as pen and paper. Pain in my hand and wrist makes writing difficult and I have no access to a computer, typewriter, etc. I apologise for the length and disjointed nature of this letter, the main points (in summary) are:

1. I do not suffer from any major mental disorder.

2. I am not a danger to myself, or others.

3.` The requested assessments could be completed if I were discharged from "hospital", and appointments scheduled in Masterton.

4. I have been here over eight weeks, and there have been four or five reports completed in that time, some of which suggest that I have "Delusional Disorder" for thinking that some Police officers are not treating me fairly, there has not been any consideration given to the possibility that this belief may be valid

5. I am being forcibly medicated with strong anti-psychotic medication, causing serious side effects. There has been no formal cognitive test done to support the "diagnosis" and no "treatment" apart from the medication.

6. I respectfully submit that I was fit to plead not guilty (as I did), I am fit to appear in Court, and fit to represent myself if necessary. I attach a copy of the decision of Judge DRW Barry on the matter of an application by the Crown pursuant to Section 344A of the Crimes Act 1961, dated 30 September 2010. I opposed the Crown's application and represented myself at the hearing of it. The application was in relation to a related charge of Escaping From Custody.

Paragraph 19 of Judge Barry's decision explains that this charge was included in the indictment for allegedly Perverting the Course of Justice.

During the course of the hearing the Crown made another application, under section 347 of the Crimes Act, that I be discharged of the offence (deemed to be an acquittal). I managed to conduct myself appropriately, under difficult circumstances, and represent myself competently. I prepared for the hearing as best I could, having only received the various precedent decisions less than a day before the hearing (at least one of these was handed to me after the hearing began, the first time I'd seen it) and I achieved the outcome I had planned to achieve. There were no "emotional outbursts" as referred to in Dr Rimkeit's report, not did I speak "out of turn" at any stage or have to be rebuked by the Judge. I was acquitted of the charge, after an application from the Crown to the Judge to do so under section 347.

7. An urgent inquiry is required into the factual inaccuracies in the psychiatric reports written since I have been incarcerated and forcibly drugged and the factually incorrect information given by Constable Cunningham to Dr Barry-Walsh. The Family Court has asked for yet another report now. The problem is that subsequent reports take the "previous history" - and the previous reports - into account, and are, and will be, therefore tainted. Another example of the factual inaccuracies is the claim on page 9 of Dr Rimkeit's report that I was abused as a young child. This is simply not true.

I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible.

Katherine Raue
19 April 2011

To Fax: (04) 914 3603 URGENT 20 April 2011
From Fax: (04) 918 2562 Katherine Raue, Rangipapa Unit, Porirua Hospital

To the High Court at Wellington:

May it please the Court:
Further to my application for a Judicial Inquiry pursuant to section 84 of the Mental Health Act, dated 19 April 2011.

I am being prevented from contacting anyone, including Legal Services, the Court, the Police, etc, and staff are being extremely obstructive and not facilitating communication with lawyers. Staff continually sat "later", or simply disappear for hour after hour, day after day.

Lawyers assigned by legal aid are refusing to accept or carry out instructions. Several such lawyers have been instructed to address the matter of the factual inaccuracies in the recent reports and to request a Judicial Inquiry into these matters, and sumply refuse to do so, perferring to delay and drag out these proceedings in order to extract the maximum amount of legal aid that they can they then inform me that the grant has been used up and for that reason they cannot continue to act. One "forgot" to attend yesterday's hearing.

This is a gross miscarriage of justice. I am the victim of crime - not the perpetrator! I am not delusional in believing that certain police officers are not treating me fairly. The failure and refusal of Wairarapa Police to investigate child abuse allegations has been well publicised recently.

I reported my concerns about Michael Murphy's violence (and that of his associates) to Police, who refused to acknowledge or investigate my allegations. Police then disclosed my complaint to Murphy, who then came to my house with his associates and attacked me. Police refused to charge him in spite of a mountain of evidence of the violent attack then corruptly charged me with Perverting the Course of Justice after Murphy broke into my house to steal the evidence of his violent attack.

Murphy recently threw a large rock through my window, Police refused to take a statement from me. Staff at the facility where I am being held are refusing to allow me to contact Police, IPCA, family, friends, my bank, my landlady, the Court, etc. The refusals amount to perverting the course of justice in themselves!

Documents which were in my possession at the time of my arrest on 4th March 2011 and others which were handed to me at the Masterton Police station have also disappeared including a copy of pages from Constable Rhymer's notbook and a Court Summons. Staff at Rangipapa Unit gave me two fax forms and told me to write faxes to Masterton Police and Arohata Prison specifically about this missing propperty, which I did on 10th April, but then staff informed me that they had received instructions from Dr Rimkeit and Dr Short and that they were not to send the faxes!

The Unit Prison Liaison Officer, Chris Norris, told staff and me that Arogata Prison staff were saying I had never been at the Prison. I was actually admitted there not just once, but twice - once on 5th March 2011, and a second admission was processed on the 7th March because the amicus curiae didn't turn up to Court that day and so I was remanded in custody until the following day.

The missing page of Constable Rhymer's notebook was found to be missing on the night on 7th March, I recorded this with a green highlighter given to me (loaned) by prison staff at Arohata.

The clear, heat sealed plastic property bag from Masterton Police station was shown to me by Prison staff on the evening of 7th March, it was opened by Prison staff in front of me and the papers given to me, the notebook page was obviously removed at the Masterton police station. It is the fifth of five pages written by Constable Rhymer about the burglary by Murphy, the subject of the current charge of Perverting the Course of Justice.

It is now considered a crime to fail to report child abuse. Preventing me from contacting Police and IPCA regarding the abuse by Murphy and his associates is therefore a crime.

Murphy demonstrated his violent tendencies when he smashed my door in in February 2009, and again when he threw a rock through my window recently. He did this because I raised concerns with Police regarding him and his associates in regard to child abuse and violent behaviour. My "responsible clinicians" are preventing me contacting police, IPCA, etc, to report these violent crimes, child abuse, etc, and saying I am delusional. I am not.

Katherine Raue

Attached: 1 x affidavit from Witness X, - 3 pages
1 x decision of Judge DRW Barry dated 30 September 2010
1 x copy of the Depositions transcript of evidence .
The application got me out of Rangipapa almost immediately. The High Court called it up within days, Rimkeit and Short tried to stop me attending the Court hearing of the Application, saying it would be bad for my health or some rubbish, the same excuse they used to stop me havin paper and pens, mail in or out, phone calls in or out, etc, etc, I had to phone lawyers and insist they phone the Court and tell them that the co-respondent was preventing me attending the hearing which was an ouotrageous act of corruption and a total breach of my human rights, the decision to allow me to attend was made at the last minute after a lot of outside intervention.

I got to the Court and found a group of supporters waiting which included Benjamin Easton, who were aware of the situation, fortunately for me. Benjamin had prepared a couple of Writs and other documents, and was eventually permitted to enter the Court and assist me to represent myself.

I was immediately moved to Te Whare Ahuru, to remove me from the jurisdiction of the Capital Coast Health Board, the co-respondent, and therefore invalidate the application, whereupon another corrupt and incompetent "psychiatrist" took over, Dr Gary Orr, who conspired with Drs Rimkeit and Short in continuing this corrupt detention, until Dr Wolfgang Kure put a stop to it after I demanded that the lawyer who had "discontinued" my application (Pamela Harvey) reinstate it immediately listing the Hutt Valley Health Board and the Attorney General as co-respondents. Once again I was released within days. I believe this was due partly to the instruction to the lawyer, in front of witnesses, to reinstate the Application immediately (as soon as she told me it had been "discontinued", weeks later when I asked her what the delay was in having it heard), and partly to a growing campaign of public awareness including protests outside the hospital, a petition, etc, almost daily visits and phone calls from concerned citizens, and a growing awareness of the corruption being perpetrated at the already damned local mental health service, etc. This community network did more to help than most of the lawyers, who pocketed thousands.

It's seriously concerning that honest, sane and law abiding citizens are being locked in mental asylums, because the police are telling people I'm delusional for criticising them. The unhealthy relationship between the Masterton Police and the Masterton Court staff is well known, as is the sleazy depravity of officers like ex Constable Stephen Wakefield, etc. Dr Justin Barry-Walsh's report documents how corrupt Court liaison officer Alison Mulholland told Dr Barry-Walsh to interview Constable Cunningham about me - she knew perfectly well that Cunningham is a corrupt liar! Cunningham then lied to Dr Barry-Walsh, telling him that I had a history of negative involvement with police "when she previously lived in Wellington" - this is complete and utter fiction and nothing but an orchestrated litany of deliberate LIES! I had next to nothing to do with police all my life till I moved to Carterton and became a target for the corrupt thieves on the Carterton District Council and the corrupt local police and their mates!

I was simply locked up to stop me making true statements about local police and other officials on this website, which is a breach of human rights. If anyone doesn't like what I write on here they are welcome to take defamation action - Georgina Beyer threatened to do it, the Director General of MAF threatened to do it, Gary McPhee threatened to do it - but the government has just passed the Search and Surveillance Bill and other legislation turning New Zealand into a Police state, while the same police who are the main cause of the local suicide rate being double that of the rest of the country because they have been throwing child abuse files in the rubbish bin..

Sitting on their backsides looking at how they can shut my website down!

This is an email from one local sergeant to another:
"Murray JohnstonSenior SergeantMasterton
Kevin Basher---07/09/2010 07:47:45---Something needs to be looked at regarding RAUE using her 'Blog" to make statements regarding our staff.
From: Kevin Basher/POLICE/NZ
To: Murray Johnston/POLICE/NZ@NZPOLICE
Date: 07/09/2010 07:47
Subject: Fw: Formal Complaint, Information Request: Assault by police, refusal to take complaints or investigate them properly
----- Forwarded by Kevin Basher/POLICE/NZ on 07/09/2010 07:42 -----

I'm grateful to Dr Wolfgang Kure for having the courage to be honest. I hope that the dark history of the Hutt Valley Mental Health 'services" will change under his guidance and that Drs like Gary Orr, Jackie Short and Brenda Sally Rimkeit are sacked, and academics in the field like Sarah Romans are exposed for what they are - devious and corrupt liars, who ruin lives and actually CAUSE suicide - not prevent it, or treat it - read Dr Orr's "Treatment Plan" for yourself - after corrupt Dr Rimkeit said
"It is my opinion (and that of forensic psychiatrist Dr Jacqueline Short, currently my acting supervisor) that Ms Raue is unfit to stand trial. She currently has a mental impairment which is Delusional Disorder. Ms Raue has stated on a number of occasions during this assessment period that she feels capable of representing and defending herself against the current charges. She has suggested that her main line of defence is that the charges are the result of corrupt acts by certain parties and that she will name these parties in Court. My concern is that if she proceeds to represent herself at Court she may, through her delusional belief system, falsely accuse certain parties of wrongdoing."
What outrageous claptrap!  This woman, Brenda Sally Rimkeit, is just another Linda Astor - barely qualified, inexperienced, and TOTALLY corrupt!  My defence is a matter for the Court to evaluate - NOT her!  Since when can devious cunning women like this appoint themselves judge AND jury?  I have every right to accuse the police of corruption in the Court if I wish - since when does that mean a person is mentally ill?  New Zealanders should be outraged about this because if it can happen to me it can happen to any one else too.

The safeguards are non existent for mental health patients - sure you can try complaining to the District Inspector - it won't do you any good - the only thing that will is a Judicial Review, and within days of instructing my lawyer in front of a witness to reinstate my application for a Judicial Inquiry immediately I was released from Te Whare Ahuru - just like I was released from Rangipapa immediately after filing it in the first place - because everyone involved knew this corruption wouldn't stand up to close scrutiny!

Dr Orr devised a "Treatment Plan" saying - don't give her any paper or writing materials to prepare her defence or write to lawyers, etc, don't send any faxes or do any photocopying, - Drs Rimkeit and Short also cut off all communication with the outside world saying in their professional opinion this was the best "treatment" for my alleged "Delusional Disorder"  - no mail, no phone calls, no visitors - no nothing, just sitting in a chair all day staring into space medicated into oblivion - this was all an orchestrated litany of utter lies!  Funded by YOUR taxes!  - While the NZ police are claiming to be under resourced - THIS is what they're spending your money on - corruptly bullying INNOCENT people.