I have documented the manner in which the matter has been dealt with to evidence the dysfunction, which continues,almost eight years later.
It all started when I received this letter from the Board:
I have never been charged with an offence involving a child in my life, I had informed the Deputy Principal, referred to as "Dallas" in the emails below, of that fact several weeks prior to receivig the letter, and informed the school of that immediately on receipt of the letter.
The Board insisted that the NZ Police had informed them that I had been charged by Police with an offence involving a child, which is blatantly untrue, it is a complete lie.
I requested all information from the school and the Ministry, who both tried to evade the legislation and refused to provide the information. Below is the letter from the Ministry showing their attempts to limit the information released.
I am writing to again to request a meeting with the Board of Trustees and the IPCA regarding the orchestrated litany of lies being spread throughout the community, Courts, Privacy Commissioner's office, and far and wide, regarding me, by local police and their mates - better work stories indeed! I refer to a letter from the Board of Trustees of the South End School sacking me from my job at the school
- This all began when Deputy Principal of the South End School Dallas Powell came and told me about the conversation she'd had with the Staff representative on the Board of Trustees regarding the notes of a Board meeting in early 2009 at which Rod O'Leary and Gavin Kennedy and others, including the police, had lied to the Board in telling them that I had been charged with "an offence involving a child".
- Dallas told me that a decision had been made at that meeting to send me the letter which I later received, sacking me over the false allegation. Blatantly, dishonestly, corruptly.
- I told Dallas Powell that the allegation was untrue, and requested an immediate meeting with the Board.
- There was no response to that request for a meeting.
- My protest that the allegation was untrue was completely ignored.
- I then received the letter containing the slanderous, libelous, allegation, in writing!
- I again requested a meeting with the Board, the request has been totally ignored completely, arrogantly, corruptly.
- i went to the school and told o'Leary I had never been charged with any such offence, and asked for an apology and reinstatement.
- O'Leary and Kennedy responded by issuing me with a trespass notice.
- I requested police recover all our property from the school, garden tools, plants and other equipment, etc, as the continued retention of it, and issuing of the trespass notice, was effectively theft.
- O'Leary and Kennedy lied to the Privacy Commissioner's office, regarding several issues, firstly claiming that no infomation existed about the source of the infomation because I told them I had recently been charged with such an offence and this was the first they had heard of it, when I told them - an obvious and blatant lie of enormous magnitude!
- O'Leary and Kennedy lied to the Privacy Commissioner's office, regarding several complaints from parents regarding the manner in which I have been treated by the Board, and certain staff members.
- I REQUEST AN URGENT MEETING BE CALLED IMMEDIATELY TO DISCUSS THIS IN LIGHT OF THE SLANDEROUS LIES AND FALSE ALLEGATIONS ABOUT ME CONTAINED IN THE LETTER TO THE ARMSTRONG FAMILY DATED 30 APRIL 2010, AND THE LIES TOLD TO A NUMBER OF OTHER PEOPLE ABOUT THESE MATTERS, BY STAFF AND BOARD MEMBERS, FOR OVER A YEAR.
- WE WANT ALL OUR PROPERTY AND PLANTS RETURNED TO US IMMEDIATELY.
School secretary Elaine Scully and statutory manager Ken Wilson then sent the following emails - Scully is a liar - I DID have a job at the school, as evidenced by the letter from the Board, and correspondence from the Minister of Education Louise Upston, and as can be seen from my email, I did not call her ANY names under the sun - her allegations of abuse are LIES. Like her allegations to police that I stole correspondence between the school and another sacked staff member from the letterbox of a Board member - Scully gave it to the wrong child to take home to mummy! Elaine Scully is the main problem at the South End school, she is a liability, she should have been sacked long ago!
The Privacy Commissioner's tax payer funded 'investigator' Dawn Swan proved to be nothing but an overpaid liar, she insisted that I must have told the Board that I had recently been charged by Police with an offence involving a child, which defies belief.
I complained to the Ombudsmen. They backed the Privacy Commissioner initially.
Local politician Kelvyn Alp then wrote to the Ombudsmen demanding that they reopen their so called investigation as it was clearly flawed.
The Ombudsmen capitulated and reopened the investigation, this time deciding that the Board had acquired the defamatory gossip on which they based their letter to me "via a local kindergarten" and other ridiculous statements which will never stand up in a Court of law in any way shape or form
So the latest procrastination from the Ministry of Education, in line with their evidence policy of delay, deny, defer, is the following letter received from the Ministry dated 22 February 2017. This says that the Minister of Education Hekia Parata has asked Katrina Casey to reply to my concerns. These include concerns about the Ministry I might add, as the Minister is well aware.
This letter says that the Ministry has conferred with the Board of Trustees, and they have confirmed that they would consider my latest correspondence under its formal complaints procedure at its meeting on 15 February and then communicate back to me. It's now nearing the end of April, two months later and there has been no communication, as usual.
What makes the Ministry's response even more ridiculous is the fact that it is evident from a notice published in the Gazette that a Statutory Manager was appointed on 26 January 2017. It can be seen from the notice that the Board would be acting ultra vires in considering my concerns, they should be dealt with by the Statutory Manager.
This is the second time in recent years that a Statutory Manager has been appointed to run the school, the first being Ken Wilson, author of the email above - another overpaid civil servant who should be charged with perverting the course of justice and failing in his fiduciary duties.
It is also clearly evident that representatives of the South End school have lied through their teeth from 2009 to the present day, including the information they provided to the Ombudsmen and Privacy Commissioner. The significant failings of the offices of the Ombudsmen and Privacy Commissioner are evident in the fact that the Ombudsmen were forced to reopen the investigation and the evidence which directly contradicts statements made in the reports.
This is the second time the Board have done this, they sacked another staff member while the previous Statutory Manager was supposed to be in control.
We are still trying to obtain legal assistance to apply for judicial review and will proceed to lodge an application without legal assistance if necessary. An example of why we can't get legal assistance is illustrated below:
"In respect of complaining about the IPCA, there is no process I know of short of the High Court in litigation.
However a new Authority is about to be appointed Sir David Carruthers previously Parole Board Chairperson, and before that Chief District Court Judge. (sic)
You could complain to him that his staff have not done their job, as a new broom he might be interested.
Given . . . changes in Legal Aid funding I should advise you I am not going to be able to take your case on legal aid.
I have been doing criminal legal aid files for some time, but with the introduction of fixed fees and the associated administrative burden now required for legal aid, in order to make a living I am forced to reduce the amount of legal aid cases I can do.
Partly as result of this tightening in the year ended March 2011 , i.e. 12 months ago and that I had my worst year ever earning less than the average wage, $50,000, as a result I have been forced me to reconsider the number of cases on legal aid I can take.
In the civil area, where your case falls, the paperwork required from the Legal Services Agency is onerous.
It is does not surprise me that of 4000 lawyers willing to take legal aid prior to 31 December 2011 now only about 2000 will.
I regret given the time delay and still not having all your files, and the new legal aid regime that trying to take on your case requires more time than I have.
Regrettably the payment offered form civil legal aid (which you of course are likely to be required to repay) does not provide a fair reward for work done.
Whilst I do not like to reduce the decision to a financial one, I regret having to be more selective in taking legal aid cases, and have turned down 10 in the last month, your potential case is not even ready to be considered and in addition to financial considerations I regret I don't have the time.
I will return your files.
I wrote to several members of parliament about this matter, hardly any bothered to even reply, Andrew Little's pathetic response is below: