"We have maintained a silence closely resembling stupidity" - Neil Roberts

Until we have legislation adopted into law to ensure fiduciary accountability and transparency in public affairs we will continue to have human rights breached because the existing crown immunity and lack of any independent oversight invites corruption to flourish.


"Question authority, and think for yourself" - Timothy Leary


"We have maintained a silence closely resembling stupidity" - Neil Roberts


"Information is the currency of democracy" - Thomas Jefferson


‎"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever does." - Margaret Mead

"The truth is like a lion, you don't have to defend it. Let it loose, it will defend itself."

"I = m c 2 [squared] where "I" am information" - Timothy Leary

"Ring the bells that still can ring, forget your perfect offering, there's a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in." Leonard Cohen

"The internet is a TV that watches you"

Friday, July 11, 2014

Conspiracy to scuttle the Ady Gil. Captain's Blog March 20 2014 at 9:05pm:

This is the account of the sinking of the Ady Gil.  

After Pete Bethune won a historic victory against Japanese whalers in the International Court of Justice he decided it was time to stand up and tell the truth about the sinking of the Ady Gil.  

This is the Captains Blog:


Ady Gil just before we commenced towing. 30 hours after ramming she still sits high in the water. 6 hours later she was abandoned.

"After Watson's recent post, I cannot let all his half-truths and lies about the sinking of Ady Gil go unanswered.  Watson claims the vessel was doomed, however this is simply not true.  Four of us, including Watson, were involved in a conspiracy to secretly scuttle the vessel to garner sympathy from media and the public, and all done without the permission or knowledge of its owner. 

After the Ady Gil was rammed by Japanese whalers in Antarctica, we got the order from Paul Watson to covertly scuttle (sink) her, but also to pretend we tried our best to save the vessel.  Only 3 people on the Bob Barker were initially aware of this.  Chuck Swift, Luke Van Horn and myself.  Crew spent 30 hours removing everything from the Ady Gil because we planned to abandon her.  Chuck, Luke and myself then went aboard, I opened up the sea cocks and hatches, and we then connected the tow lines.  We started the pretend tow some 30 hours after the initial ramming.  Over the next 6 hours she slowly got deeper in the water until the tow rope broke.  I was asleep when the rope broke.  Chuck ordered the Bob Barker to continue.  No effort to reconnect the tow ropes was made. Nor did anyone go back aboard.  The Bob Barker just continued on in the direction of where we thought the whalers were.  This was in the middle of the night when it was dark. I awoke several hours later when it was light. We then filmed me supposedly making the decision to abandon her. 

There are only 6 people who were definitely privy to what happened.  Paul, Chuck, Luke, myself, and 2 of the Ady Gil crew.  The problem for Sea Shepherd is the vessel was owned by Ady Gil.  In sinking her, we had basically destroyed his property, something Ady Gil is extremely upset about.  In his recent and other posts, Watson makes a series of false claims.

Watson says the vessel was already destroyed, however this was simply not the case.  It was a composite vessel that needed a new bow and this is not a difficult engineering challenge. Composite boats broken completely in half have been repaired numerous times.  The Designers (Loomocean) and the original boatbuilder (Calibre Boats) all stated the vessel could be easily repaired.

Watson says she was difficult to tow.  This is not true. The vessel was easy to tow backwards.  She towed better in this direction in any case.  Also, given the damage was in the bow, towing her backwards would drain water from inside. 

Watson says we towed her for 36 hours.  This is not true.  We spent 30 hours removing gear and preparing her for abandonment.  We then opened the sea cocks and towed her for 6 hours as she sank.  The sea cocks were opened before we had towed the vessel even one inch.

Watson says we had to sink her because she was a navigational hazard.  This is not true, simply by fact she was in a sea full of ice posing much greater threats to vessels than a carbon fibre race boat.

Watson says I am on camera making the decision to abandon her.  This is true, but it was simply filmed as part of the charade to make it look like we tried our best to save her.  Note this footage is in broad daylight, while the abandonment was done in darkness.  There is also footage of Watson being shot by the Japanese, and yet only the most naive of people would ever believe this event actually took place.

Watson says it would tie up the Bob Barker for an excessive period to tow the Ady Gil to Australia, however the proposed plan was to tow her to the French base, just a short distance away. 

Now if the best course of action was to abandon her, then Ady Gil (the man) should have been made aware of this. He owned the vessel after all, and would probably have agreed.  The vessel had a satellite transponder that could be switched on.  This would have revealed her position for years to come, and Ady Gil or Sea Shepherd could have mounted a recovery operation when time and resources suited. Instead we removed the transponder and all batteries, thereby removing any chance of the vessel being salvaged.

I have a few regrets in life.  One of them was ever obeying Watson's orders to scuttle the Ady Gil.  We lied to the crew of Sea Shepherd, sponsors, donors, Ady Gil, media and our families, and I am ashamed to have been part of such a dishonest act.  I suspect if I'd stood up to Watson then the vessel probably would have been towed to Antarctica.  I made a mistake and I apologise for it. What appals me now is Watson is intent on continuing with the lies, and he continues to malign me and others over it. I am tired of all the deception and dishonesty.

Since September 2010, Watson has attacked Ady Gil (the man) on numerous occasions. His attacks have been unwarranted, especially given how generous Ady Gil was in providing his vessel to Sea Shepherd.  If Watson had apologised to Ady Gil in 2010, I suspect Ady Gil would have let it slide.  Instead Watson has continued spewing forth his vitriol and bile, and it is no surprise Ady Gil is now biting back with a lawsuit.  Sometimes we reap what we sew.  And in this case, Sea Shepherd is facing a difficult lawsuit from a man resourced enough to take it to completion.

A few years ago Watson said he was tired of all the accusations against him, and that people should take him to court if we really believed we had a case.  I took his advice, took him to court and won.  He was forced to pay me the $500k plus interest I was owed, exactly as I had stated all along. SSCS should have just accepted we had a binding contract and paid up - instead they wasted tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees in a case they were always going to lose.

It would seem Ady Gil is now taking Watson's advice and also taking them to court.  I don't know anything about Ady Gil's case, aside from what is posted by Watson.  I have not met with Ady Gil's lawyers, nor have I been asked to testify.  But I do know if Watson really believes in his fairy tale about the sinking of the Ady Gil, he should subpoena us all and have us testify.  He won't of course.  He will just continue to whine and whinge that everyone else is to blame for the problems of his own making.

Those of you intent on attacking Ady Gil, few of you have ever met the man, and because he refuses to get involved in all the slander, you have not heard his side of events.  Watson's post had all manner of nasty comments from people wishing Ady Gil was dead, abusing him and posting his home address.  Thankfully the worst were removed.  But it is still disgraceful.  Ady Gil donates to so many Animal Rights causes, most of which you never hear about.  There are few enough wealthy people donating to Animal Rights as it is, and many of the people making the vindictive comments have probably donated jack shit.  At least Ady is prepared to put his money where his mouth is. 

Ady Gil is not a close friend of mine, nor does he financially support my work.  However I do know he contributes so much to many animal rights causes, and he doesn't deserve to be pilloried like he is now.  He is simply taking legal action against Watson who has spent the last 3 years attacking him, that suggested if anyone had problems with him to take him to court, and that dishonestly ordered the covert scuttling of the Ady Gil when it was perfectly salvageable.

I don't know how this will play out. The best would be SSCS simply issue an apology to Ady Gil and come to an agreement over the deliberate sinking of his vessel.  In reality I doubt this will happen, it will go to court, and SSCS will in all probability lose another court case.  Watson will also continue to attack others. He spent 30 years attacking Greenpeace.  In recent times he's moved onto Ady Gil, Martyn Stewart, myself and others.  It is a shame he cannot focus on the real enemy.

As for the claim that Ady Gil  wants to see Sea Shepherd destroyed, I don't know if this is true or not.  I hope not.  Sea Shepherd have done a lot of good over the years, and I doubt the case has any real chance of destroying what is a very powerful and well-resourced organisation.  At the same time, recent events might be a wake-up call to the Sea Shepherd board to ensure the organisation moves forward with a new commitment to honesty and integrity, and to see its employees (namely Watson) refrain from personal attacks on others.  One can but hope…"

Source -
https://www.facebook.com/notes/pete-bethune/conspiracy-to-scuttle-ady-gil-captains-blog-30/10152275700235867

Monday, June 30, 2014

The Seasonal Employment Scheme robbing Kiwis of jobs?

Like many New Zealanders I've worked on vineyards and in orchards and done other seasonal work, manual labour, and been grateful for the job and the ability to earn a living.  Like all my mates on the orchards and vineyards I was reliable, respectful, loyal, and hard working.  Many of us worked on the same orchard or vineyard or farm year after year doing seasonal work, and had been valued employees.  After being bullied out of my job at the South End School after the extraordinary orchestrated litany of lies I worked at JRs orchard in Greytown for a couple of seasons picking apples.

The following season we all traveled to Greytown to reapply for our jobs , and waited to hear from JRs.  We all received a phone call saying thanks but no thanks, because JR had done a deal with the local National Party MP to import labour because there was way more profit for JR (and other employers) in doing that and he no doubt promised a big 'donation' to John Hayes MP.  Hayes's statements are outrageous!  WINZ didn't bus people out there we got the bus or car pooled if we didn't have a car, and people didn't prefer to sit watching TV in their homes on the dole, they preferred to have a job!

The only auditing or review of the advisability of this scheme seems to be framed to address only the benefits of the imported workers, rather than the social costs, the effect of this scheme on our local communities, or the national economy. 

Like the overwhelming number of the people I worked with on the orchard I am now reliant on a tax payer funded benefit, depressed about not only being unemployed and angry at the blatant lies from the 'Honourable' Member of Parliament (and his predecessor).

There is a strong sense of injustice felt by many people, and added to this are other social problems caused by lack of proper governance and rampant corruption and incompetence by public officials, including high and rising suicide rates and a corrupt Police force which has been found to have thrown hundreds of child abuse files in the bin and deliberately lied about it, while facilitating and concealing the problems and covering up for the offenders.

Both Labour and National plan on increasing the numbers of seasonal workers able to be recruited from overseas in spite of the effect on our local economies - these people don't spend their money in our communities, they hardly even go to the supermarket (allowed to bring food in if it's declared, and do), they take it home to their own communities - JR should go and set up orchards in the Solomons and Vanuatu, it's not rocket surgery, but he's only interested in maximising his profit.

It's reported in June that there are 8000 workers let in to work but I'd bet the number actually working here is much higher.  I'm all for supporting our neighbours in the Pacific, but who is really benefiting from this, and what's the real cost?


Kelvyn Alp - how a REAL politician gets results from corrupt public servants:

After five years Kelvyn Alp, founder of the OURNZ Party has been the only politician in New Zealand to get any results from the ongoing complaints to the Ombudsmen the Board of Trustees of the South End School in Carterton and others, about the blatant bullying, and slanderous and defamatory allegations being made by the Board and others associated with the school and the community, previously complained of by a number of senior lawyers and referred to by them as "politically motivated corruption", against former members of staff who made a huge contribution to the school, not only feeding the kids, but teaching and supporting the students to grow their own kai, prepare it, preserve it, trade it, as well as a number of other important life skills, including an extremely successful suicide prevention program.

The Privacy Commissioner's Office and Dawn Swan in particular have been involved in the conspiracy to pervert the course of justice regarding this matter.  After initially attempting to resolve the matter with the Board, in accordance with appropriate policies and procedures, I complained to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner after I received this letter from the Board of Trustees of the South End School, which contains the false allegation that I had been recently charged by Police with an offence involving a child - I have never been charged with any offence involving a child in my life and I told the Deputy Principal of the South End School several weeks prior to receiving this astounding letter:

Dawn Swan repeatedly lied about the facts regarding the matter, and refused to investigate the matter at all, instead conjuring up a fictional version of events in her own mind including the preposterous allegation that I was the one who had told the Board the slanderous and defamatory allegations.  Dawn Swan maintained this lie in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, and so did the Board of Trustees.

Thanks to the commitment and integrity of Kelvyn Alp the Ombudsmen were forced to reopen the investigation into these complaints, and forced to admit the truth, which has now opened a much larger can of worms, revealing clear and indisputable evidence that Kelvyn Alp and I were right all along - and not delusional at all - the evidence proves indisputably that there has been a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice regarding these matters which has involved tax payer corruption at the highest levels, including former Chief Ombudsman Beverly Wakem, who repeatedly refused to investigate the claims against Dawn Swan and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner despite all the evidence of blatant corruption in the manner in which Swan repeatedly claimed that I was the source of the allegations and that the school had sought or received no information from Police - which was a blatant lie as Kelvyn Alp pointed out.

Thanks to the perseverance and professionalism of Kelvyn Alp I finally received this pathetic excuse for an 'apology' from the Board of Trustees:



This rude letter is signed by none other than Elaine Scully, school secretary and Chief Witch Hunter.  It should be signed by the Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Logan Bathurst, Elaine Scully should have been sacked after she was forced to apologise for calling a young Maori student a "lying little bitch" several years ago.

Elaine Scully owes me several other apologies too, and they are long overdue.

For a start she owes me an apology for wasting Police time and making a false complaint to Police regarding her delusional allegations that I "stole" correspondence regarding the bullying and unlawful sacking of Wayne Rogers, a former groundsman at the South End School, from the letterbox of former Board member Emily Brown.  I did no such thing - I was handed the letters by the parent of a child who was in the same class as one of Emily Brown's four children, and both children have the same first name.  Emily Brown gave the letters to the wrong child, and the child's mother (and the child, if necessary) will confirm this in sworn evidence in a Court when the time comes.

On 1 May 2011 I sent the following email to the Statutory Manager appointed by the Ministry of Education, who had identified that the Board was incompetent and appointed the Statutory Manager:
Hi Ken,


I understand that you are the Statutory Manager appointed to the South End School, and have been asked to write to you regarding issues around the management and administration of the school.

I was recently handed correspondence between the school and Wayne Rogers, regarding the termination of his employment at the school, which seems to mirror the way I was treated (attached).  I've also been contacted by a number of people who have also complained about the school, including the family of a young girl who was called a "lying little bitch" - as in "You're nothing but a lying little bitch" by Elaine Scully, who is also responsible for this confidential correspondence ending up in my hands and the hands of a number of other people.  Many people said that Mrs Scully, Mr O'Leary, Ms Powell and other staff and members of the Board of Trustees have been spreading rumours throughout the community that I am a child abuser, and making similar allegations about Wayne Rogers.

I received a letter from the Board of Trustees which is attached.  Also attached is a note of thanks I received at the end of the year (2008).  The last paragraph of the letter to me, and the thank you note, make a mockery of the school's current position on the matter, and of the Court proceedings brought against me by Rod O'Leary and the former groundsman Thomas Smith.

I've also received copies of correspondence between the school and the Armstrong family about me, which frankly disgust me because they contain nasty and untrue accusations.  Furthermore, Board of Trustees member Emily Brown came to the Armstrong's home and made a number of derogatory statements about me and about how Emily had contacted Police and mental health authorities about me after I politely requested that she arrange a meeting between and the Board about this correspondence I had received containing the untrue allegation that I was a danger to the children.  Emily Brown is an adulterous liar, who has acknowledged (and boasted about) the fact that she was having it off with George Smith while still married to and living with her husband.  Emily's mother and brother committed suicide, and it disgusts many people in the community that she is going around to homes like the Armstrongs, spreading her nasty spiteful UNTRUE rumours, and causing hatred and division in the community.  She claimed to be representing the Board on this visit, which disgusted us even more.  She should resign from the Board immediately, her adultery and lies disgusts decent people in the community.  

I request the immediate return of everything I brought to the school, including the large sign, tools, hoses, plants, etc.

I request that the school write immediately to [name deleted to protect privacy] and apologise to him for distributing his correspondence and breaching his privacy.  He deserves the job as groundsman for all his voluntary work for the school!  The way the Board treats volunteers is disgraceful!

I request that you inform me immediately: 
(1) specifically what information (referred to in the correspondence) the school received about me that led them to believe I was (or "could have been") a danger to the children, and 
(2) from whom specifically the Board (or O'Leary) received this information.

The correspondence to the Armstrongs is outrageous, the two letters to them clearly contain allegations that I am a danger to the kids, O'Leary knows perfectly well that I never told him any such thing, and that there was no meeting until AFTER I received the letter sacking me, ex Deputy Principal Dallas Powell knows this too. They know perfectly well that the local corrupt police officer told him the lies about me being charged, not me, as he is not dishonestly inferring!  The visit to the Armstrong's by Emily Brown was equally outrageous and she should resign immediately because of that alone - how dare she go around the community breaching my privacy and spreading lies like this!!!?  How unprofessional!  I requested a meeting with the Board!

I request an immediate meeting with the Board to discuss the letter which I received from Gavin Kennedy. The last paragraph promises me my job back if I am "acquitted of the charges withdrawn" - there never were any charges as everyone knows, and I want my job back without further delay please.

I understand you were appointed on 1 October 2010.  How is it then that Wayne Rogers was hired and fired by Rod O'Leary and the Board if you were specifically appointed to manage employment issues (among other things)?

I look forward to your urgent response.
Kate Raue

Let's Get Growing NZ
Transparency in New Zealand
Shortly afterwards I received this email from Elaine Scully - further evidence of her incompetence and of the dishonesty of the Board and the other parties, the Privacy Commissioner, Ombudsmen, etc, who all denied any information about me existed - more and more is being revealed all the time while they continue to blatantly lie:
Hi Ken
We have had the attached email in from Kate. 


I spoke with Emily yesterday to try and ascertain how she got the attached letters.  Emily is sure she has stolen them from her letterbox.  Unfortunately for us, Emily has admitted that she often doesn’t clear her letterbox (which is on the main street) for days at a time. 

I have not responsible for this info getting into Kate’s hands as she states.  I phone Emily or leave a message on her answerphone every time I drop mail into her letterbox.  The only other way I give her board info is to hand it to her son Zac and ask him to take it home (this is usually non important info).

We have phoned the Police and asked them to come down to track this for us.

Any advice?  Do you want me to inform all the board members about what is happening?  Ray [Ray Craig, former Chairman of the Board of Trustees] was in the office this morning so I have informed him.

Cheers
Elaine.
I emailed Scully on the 3rd March 2011 asking for an apology and I'm still waiting.  She gave the letters to another Zac by mistake.  This is absolutely typical of the dysfunction, bullying, incompetence and corruption of the governance and the Board of Trustees of the South End School, the ministry of Education, the ERO, the Privacy Commissioner, the Ombudsmen and the corrupt New Zealand Police!

In an interesting coincidence, on the 25th November 2013 the local 'news' paper, the Wairarapa Times-Age, who are in the business of spreading politically biased happy clappy 'news' for all their mates and slandering everyone else, printed a 'story' titled "Big day for fixit man Super Mario, caretaker at South End School"  - the author of this 'report' is quoted as being none other than Elaine Scully.  Scully is not a journalist, and this isn't news - unlike the matters involving myself and Mr Rogers.  The article, which featured a photo of Mario Geremia (a very 'good friend' of Mrs Scully) wearing a silly hat, states:
"South End School's caretaker Mario Geremia celebrated his birthday at school this year and was made guest of honour at morning tea by the staff.  His hat reads "Super Mario" as there is nothing he can't do and he has our school looking perfect all the time.  He can construct and build, is a brilliant photographer, keeps the grounds immaculate and can repair anything.  We are truly blessed to have him here as a staff member.  The hat was presented to him by the staff and the children all sang happy birthday to him when they saw him in the playground on the day of his birthday.  Photo supplied."
And what is particularly disturbing and 'coincidental' about this is that the editor of the Wairarapa Times-Age, a little weasel of a man called Andrew Bonnallack, has steadfastly refused to report on Kelvyn Alp's demand for the Ombudsmen to reopen the inquiry and the subsequent overturning of former Chief Ombudsman Beverley Wakem's decision, or the revelation that I was right all along about the source of the slanderous defamatory lies that have done so much damage to my reputation and employment prospects for the last six years or more, or the recent pathetic excuse for an apology - while the WTA prints propaganda on behalf of Chief Witch Hunter and Gossip Spreader Elaine Scully instead!

Even more disturbing is that a man called Geoffrey Ball aka Godfrey Ball was recently charged with a number of sexual assault charges involving young and vulnerable victims and Police had stated that more victims were coming forward as a result of publicity regarding the complaints.  On 7th August 2014 Godrey/Geoff Ball committed suicide according to news reports.  His death notice, which was published in the Wairarapa Times-Age on 13th August 2014, states that he was the friend of one "Mario Geremia".

A growing number of other politicians are choosing to ignore what's really going on in our schools and government organisations like the Privacy Commissioner's Office, the Ombudsmen, IPCA etc, luckily, Kelvyn Alp is a man of action, not idle rhetoric, he sorts things out and gets results, gets the truth, instead of just fobbing people off like so many others.

Here's a link to the latest disgraceful response from the Office of the Ombudsmen - seem to have a problem embedding it . . .



This is an ongoing litany of lies, I never took a child to a supermarket without permission and both the school and the Police have repeatedly denied that they shared any information about me - repeatedly stating that no such information existed - so where is this information about this latest pack of lies?  - Where is the information that the school and the Police have been denying the existence of all this time??? 

Where is ANY information about this "information sharing" - this little gossip session - this witch hunt!  WHICH Police officers took it upon themselves to call public meetings to slander and defame me for criminal and political purposes?

The Board of Trustees claim that the Minutes of the Board meeting(s) at which the matter was discussed and the decision to send the letter was made "have been destroyed" - that's called "destroying evidence for the purpose of perverting the course of justice"!

And what of corrupt Privacy Commission investigator Dawn Swan - who invented the cock and bull story that it was ME who told the school the nonsense that Police had recently charged me with an offence involving a child?  Swan continues to collect her big fat paycheck to this very day, while she continues to refuse to acknowledge that I didn't tell anyone I'd been charged with an offence involving a child, let alone apologise for it!

And what of Dame Beverley Wakem, former Chief Ombudsman, who corruptly signed off on the previous "investigation" - cover up - of my complaint into these matters - New Zealanders should not be forced to seek the assistance of Kelvyn Alp and he should not have to bother himself prodding corrupt public officials to do their jobs while so called elected members of parliament do NOTHING!

There is evidence that three independent witnesses rang Police because I was the victim of a violent home invasion on 11th February 2009 and that was the only "incident" that occurred - Constable Peter Cletus Cunningham has a long and well documented history of LYING and CORRUPTION and he deliberately fabricated a cock and bull story about a non existent "incident" while refusing to charge the offenders for a serious, unprovoked, violent attack by a pair of lying convicted benefit fraudsters!

We have requested an extension of time to respond to this provisional opinion because it is clear that there are glaring discrepancies between the information that was previously provided and these new claims and if the claims in this letter are true - WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE OF IT?

Saturday, May 10, 2014

Peter Clague finally faces the music:

Peter Cleague - a good role model for youth?
Police refused to charge Kristin College principal Peter Clague after his wife made a formal complaint of assault against him.

He will now face the Court to answer to the charge as he prepares to start a new job at a prestigious English school, after his ex-wife launched a private prosecution against him.

The Police issued a warning to Peter Clague in response to the formal complaint but refused to lay charges.

Now, Clague, 48, faces a charge of male assaults female for an incident at his Greenhithe home in September 2010, which carries a possible sentence of two years imprisonment. Clague's ex-wife, Jeanne Jackman, alleges Clague ran at her in anger, shook her by the shoulders, and pushed her on to stairs, causing her to fracture her tailbone. She also alleges Clague had previously been psychologically abusive.

Barrister Michael Lloyd will represent Clague this month. He stated "Peter's told me about this and we're working out how we're going to handle it all but that's really as far as it's gone, so I can't really say a whole lot more than that," he said this week. "It's the same case ... she's giving it another flogging now."  An extraordinary statement indeed for a barrister to make.

Clague previously told the Herald on Sunday: "My career is on the whim of a woman who is angry over a break-up ... principals don't come back from false allegations like this."  Which is very interesting when you consider how the principal of the South End school in Carterton was involved in the extreme corruption which has only just recently been validated by the Ombudsmen's Office, involving slanderous and defamatory false allegations of a very serious nature made by the principal and others against the manager of the local community gardens, who was supporting students in a particularly positive manner (which of course did not suit those people who were and are exploiting vulnerable young people in our community), not to mention the history of other allegations against Peter Clague and the allegations and supporting evidence of his involvement in endorsing the taxpayer funded statutory rape of a 14 year old.

Clague previously claimed that he and Jackman argued in their home's driveway and Jackman became upset.

In documents filed with the court this week, Jackman said she wanted to bring the prosecution against Clague before he left in August for his role at 500-year-old Bromsgrove School in Worcestershire.

Jeanne Jackman said she filed the private prosecution after police refused to act. Police said they could issue only a warning because the alleged assault happened more than two years earlier - too long ago to prosecute.

Clague was previously associate deputy head at Wanganui Collegiate.

Jackman is the director of a professional coaching company and the North Harbour Living Without Violence service.

The Ministry of Justice confirmed Clague will appear at the North Shore District Court on May 20.

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Drug tests urgently required for NZ politicians:


,
Despite all the bleating that the sky would fall in if we legalised "gay marriage" in New Zealand, it was another recent piece of legislation passed by the National government that led to a disturbing increase in crime and ill effects on society.  The legislation was short lived as well as ill advised.

The Psychoactive Substances Act came into effect on 17 July 2013 thanks to Matthew Bowden and Peter Dunne among others.  Less than twelve months later the government was forced into an embarrassing u-turn.

In late April 2014 it was revealed that Peter Dunne's son, a lawyer who works at Chen Palmer,  advertises on the Chen Palmer website about his "valuable inside knowledge of how Parliament works". Peter Dunne says his son is "entitled to trade off the fact that he's my son in his business, if he sees that it's to his advantage".

On 7th May 2014 the National government, in partnership with the Crown, instrumented its latest fiscal fiasco and legislative disaster damage control strategy, the Psychoactive Substances Amendment Act 2014, which states that:
"Every interim approval granted in respect of a psychoactive product under clause 4 (before that clause was repealed by section 8 of the Psychoactive Substances Amendment Act 2014) is revoked.

    The Authority must, before the close of the day after the date of the commencement of this clause, issue a recall order under section 88 for every psychoactive product described in clause 11 (the product).

    The Authority must—

       (a) display the date of the recall order prominently on the recall order; and

        (b) notify the recall order on an Internet site maintained by or on behalf of the Authority.

    (3) For the purposes of section 88(2), the recall order is deemed to have been received by every importer, manufacturer, wholesaler, or retailer of the product on the close of the day after the date displayed on the recall order.

    (4) The recall order may—

        (a) require every importer, manufacturer, wholesaler, and retailer (or any combination of them) to—

            (i) provide information to the Authority in relation to the amount and type of the product in their possession:

            (ii) dispose of or destroy, or arrange for the disposal (including by return to a manufacturer or an importer) or the destruction of, the product in their possession:

            (iii) provide information to the Authority on the disposal of or destruction or arrangements for the disposal or destruction of the product in their possession:

        (b) specify locations where the product can be delivered for disposal or destruction:

        (c) specify a time limit for compliance with the recall order:

        (d) specify any ancillary or incidental requirement.

 13 Revocation of interim licences to sell psychoactive products granted interim approval

    Every interim licence granted under clause 7(1)(e) and (f) (before those paragraphs were repealed by section 8 of the Psychoactive Substances Amendment Act 2014) is revoked.

    For the avoidance of doubt, and regardless of the outcome of any appeal under subpart 3 of Part 2, the following may not be granted after the commencement of the Psychoactive Substances Amendment Act 2014:

        (a) an interim licence to sell psychoactive products granted interim approval by retail:

        (b) an interim licence to sell psychoactive products granted interim approval by wholesale:

        (c) an interim approval.
No compensation or damages are payable by the Crown for any loss or damage arising from the enactment of the Psychoactive Substances Amendment Act 2014.”

This is an abrupt about face for the government and evidence of a seriously dysfunctional legislative process - not to mention the stink of taxpayer funded corruption.   The cost to the taxpayers remains to be seen, the social costs have already been seen, with deaths reported and countless reports of addictions and other serious harmful effects - hence the final clause (above).  It is less than a year since the government passed the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013, which contained the following definition:
"psychoactive substance means a substance, mixture, preparation, article, device, or thing that is capable of inducing a psychoactive effect (by any means) in an individual who uses the psychoactive substance."
This Act stated that a person who is a New Zealand resident may apply to 'the Authority' for a licence to import, manufacture or sell psychoactive substances.  So called "experts" on the advisory panel appointed by Peter Dunne MP included Bob Kerridge of the SPCA.

The Key Regulatory Roles are clearly inadequate and the regulatory authority as well as the legislative process, and the present government, clearly incompetent and/or corrupt, and all the while these chemical drugs are labeled as "synthetic cannabis" by journalists and 'television celebrities', drug industry spokespersons, and other key players (and fellow passengers on the gravy train), such as the NZ Drug Foundation, who claim that the drugs need to be legalised "or else they'll end up on the black market" - is that a good reason to legalise cannabis then?

Does alcohol have a psychoactive effect on an individual?  Is tobacco addiction a psychoactive effect?

While the NZ Police and the health system mop up after the industry, and the Police fly round in helicopters looking for cannabis every summer, we've got politicians legalising synthetic drugs at the drop of a hat for their nearest and dearest.


~"~

Links -
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2013/0053/latest/whole.html#DLM5278431

http://nz.linkedin.com/pub/matt-bowden/19/270/181

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9985816/Dunne-legal-high-conflict-examined

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11242415

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2013/0053/latest/whole.html#DLM5042921

http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/dunne-names-psychoactive-substances-bill-expert-committee

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2013/0053/latest/whole.html#DLM5043008

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Simon Bridges auctions off Aotearoa New Zealand - National's April Fools gift of the nation:



From Simon Bridges' address to the Advantage NZ 2014 Geotechnical Petroleum Forum - 2nd April 2014 - Block Offer 2014:

"So, now onto what many of you are waiting for.

I’m pleased to announce this morning the areas that are available for bidding in the 2014 New Zealand Block Offer.

There are three onshore release areas and five offshore release areas.

Iwi, hapū and local authorities have been consulted on all of the areas that  I’m releasing today.

Let’s start with the onshore areas that will be available.

Onshore Taranaki Basin

The first onshore area is Taranaki.

The area was first drilled here in 1865, and it is New Zealand’s only producing basin to date.

Three permits were granted for the onshore Taranaki Basin as part of Block Offer 2013, reflecting strong interest in the area.

The 2014 release areas are prospective for oil and gas and feature numerous geological structures that are likely to be prospective for petroleum.

Producing fields near the release area include:

    Kapuni – a gas condensate field;
    Tariki-Ahuroa – which is also a gas condensate field; and
    McKee – an oil and gas field;

The area has good coverage in existing data and represents a relatively mature opportunity for companies.

Onshore East Coast Basin

Turning to the other side of the North Island, onshore East Coast is again on offer in 2014.

More than 40 wells have been drilled onshore since 1955 reflecting the prospectivity of the area.

We are seeing international interest in this area, particularly in tight oil and gas, and two permits were awarded for the onshore East Coast Basin in Block Offer 2013.

Onshore West Coast Basin

This year I’m pleased to add the West Coast of the South Island to the acreage on offer.

The West Coast has attracted exploration interest since the early 20th century, and has known prospectivity for both oil and gas.

Onshore Graticular

Last year we introduced a graticular methodology for offshore release areas, to give bidders the flexibility to define their desired permit area within predetermined limits.

You may have noted on the maps onscreen that for Block Offer 2014 we have extended this approach to onshore release areas.

Bids for onshore Taranaki may be for areas up to 250 square kilometres.

Other onshore bid areas may be up to one thousand square kilometres

Now to the five offshore areas that are available in this year’s block offer.

Offshore Taranaki Basin

The first is offshore Taranaki.

Off the west coast of the North Island, the basin stretches from the coast of Auckland to the northern tip of the South Island.

Producing wells adjacent to the area on offer in 2014 include:

    Māui – a gas condensate and oil field;
    Kupe – a gas condensate field
    Pohokura – also a gas condensate field; and
    the Tui oil field;

This includes acreage from a relinquished offshore Taranaki Petroleum Exploration Permit that became available late last year. We know the basin is highly prospective for oil and gas but remains under-explored and has real potential for future discoveries.

Two permits were awarded in the offshore Taranaki Basin in Block Offer 2013.

Offshore Reinga-Northland Basin

The Reinga-Northland Basin off the west coast of Northland is on offer again in 2014.

While an exploration permit was awarded to Statoil for part of the Reinga-Northland Basin last year, it remains virtually unexplored.

However, we have strong evidence that it is prospective for oil and gas, and it has many similarities with the Taranaki Basin.

This is one of the more exciting areas on offer.

Offshore New Caledonia Basin

A new basin has been added to the available areas for 2014.

The New Caledonia Basin release area, located off the west coast of the North Island, covers a total of 49,000 square kilometres.

Like the Reinga-Northland Basin, the New Caledonia basin remains virtually unexplored and again has many geological similarities with the Taranaki Basin.

Despite being truly frontier acreage, the area is already attracting strong interest from Majors and Super Majors, so it looks promising.

Offshore Pegasus Basin

I’m pleased to announce that the Pegasus Basin will be on offer this year.

The area, which is located off the south-east of the North Island, covers an area of approximately 75,000 square kilometres.

The first exploration permit for this basin was awarded in late 2012 to Anadarko.

Offshore Great South & Canterbury Basins

The last of the offshore areas on offer in 2014 are the Great South and Canterbury Basins.

This large area off the lower east coast of the South Island is prospective for oil and gas.

Discoveries in this region date back to the mid-1970s and through to the 1980s.

It has a long demonstrated active petroleum system that has been the subject of renewed interest since 2007, and two permits were awarded for the Great South-Canterbury Basins last year.

To sum up, the Government is offering 405,000 square kilometres of acreage in the 2014 New Zealand Block Offer.

The three onshore and five offshore release areas on offer make up a tender that ranges from smaller appraisal blocks in well-explored areas containing previously drilled wells, through to large blocks with running room in frontier regions where little to no exploration has taken place.

Industry has six months to prepare their most compelling work programmes.

New Zealand has built a strong, world-class regulatory framework to provide economic opportunities but also provide the necessary environmental protections.  The Government expects companies to clearly demonstrate how exploration activity will be completed within our regulatory framework.

All bids are due by 25 September; and I expect to be able to announce the successful bidders in December this year.

Industry nominations

This morning I’m also pleased to announce that today we are opening industry nominations for Block Offer 2015"
The National government continue to rape and pillage our rights, our assets, and everything else of any value.

http://static2.stuff.co.nz/files/oilgraphic.jpg


http://liberation.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451d75d69e20154360bcc59970c-450wi

Shortly after this it was revealed that Simon Bridges had absolutely no idea that he's signed away a National Park.

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

US research lab 257, Plum Island, and the Monty Python team at NZ National Centre for DIsease Control at Wallaceville:

- Attributed -

Update on the history of MAF's National Centre of Disease Investigation at Wallaceville and Isolation Unit at Silverstream.


SECRET BIO-WARFARE RESEARCH LAB 257 PLUM ISLAND...FOR SALE

IT WAS KNOWN BY MANY NAMES...PLUM ISLAND ANIMAL DISEASE CENTER, BUILDING 257, FORT TERRY 257... AND ITS EXISTENCE WAS DENIED FOR DECADES. WHAT REALLY WENT ON THERE IS STILL A MATTER OF SOME SECRECY AND WHETHER OR NOT IT IS MOVED TO KANSAS, AS WAS ONCE PLANNED, IS ALSO RATHER 'UP IN THE AIR'. 

WHERE TO PUT SUCH A NIGHTMARE?  [New Zealanders should be horrified to find out that it's at Wallaceville - 100 yards from a school, right next to the main trunck railway line, in the middle of a residential area and on top of about five major seismic fault lines!]
WE NOW KNOW THAT THE U.S. CONDUCTED BIOLOGICAL WARFARE RESEARCH THERE, AND SINCE ALMOST EVERY NATION HAS SEVERAL SUCH LABORATORIES, ONE MIGHT CONCLUDE THAT THIS LAB WAS BASICALLY "HARMLESS".
ONE MIGHT NOT EVEN CARE WHAT WENT ON THERE, OFF THE COAST OF NEW YORK. 

PLUM ISLAND, LAB 257, AN INDEFENSIBLE LITTLE PLACE, FULL OF VERY LETHAL PATHOGENS, DEADLY, STILL A THREAT TO ALL WHO LIVE NEAR IT, STILL A READY SOURCE FOR ANY TERRORISTS, REAL OR FBI-CREATED(?), WHO MIGHT WANT TO GATHER FROM IT TO ATTACK AMERICA.
PLUM ISLAND'S LAB 257 WAS "'the only type of research lab authorized to handle diseases that are communicable between humans and animals and for which there is no known cure'"...NO KNOWN CURE.


THE NEW YORK TIMES WAS A BIT IRATE OVER ITS FATE IN 2005.
<Homeland Security took over from the Agriculture Department in 2003, "was not designed to be a highly secure facility." >>

CNN DID A SMALL PIECE ON PLUM ISLAND IN 2004
< The Army later handed over control of the facility to the USDA.
DHS official McCarthy told the AP that Lab 257 was closed in 1995, and "right now it poses no health hazard.">>  
THEY GO ON TO INSINUATE THAT ANYONE WHO THINKS PLUM ISLAND IS A DARK MYSTERY MIGHT BE NUTS (THOUGH THEY NEVER, EVER SAY SUCH THINGS OUTRIGHT, PERISH THE THOUGHT).
IN CONSIDERING CNN, OR ANY AMERICAN MAINSTREAM MEDIA, AS I HAVE ALWAYS SAID HERE IN THE TEA ROOM, CONSIDER WHO OWNS THE MEDIA...
<>
[READ, CERTAINLY, BUT ALWAYS DIG INTO THINGS FOR YOURSELVES, AND DIG DEEPLY AND LONG!]

YOU MAY HAVE HEARD OF A NAZI SCIENTIST NAMED ERIC TRAUB, BROUGHT TO THE U.S. AS SO MANY OTHERS WERE UNDER OPERATION PAPERCLIP AFTER WORLD WAR 2.
<for the U.S. Navy from 1949 to 1953
, Traub returned to Germany >>

ONE OF TRAUB'S SPECIALTIES WAS VECTOR DISEASES AND THEIR USE IN BIOLOGICAL WARFARE.  
Traub visited the Plum Island Animal Disease Center (PIADC) in New York on at least three occasions in the 1950s. The Plum Island facility, operated by the Department of Agriculture, conducted research on foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) of cattle, one of Traub's areas of expertise. Traub was offered a leading position at Plum Island in 1958 which he OFFICIALLY  declined.

IT HAS BEEN SAID THAT PLUM ISLAND'S LAB 257 GAVE US LYME DISEASE, QUITE LITERALLY.
In the mid-1970s, a mysterious disease broke out in the area around the town of Old Lyme, CT.
This severely debilitating syndrome was given the name Lyme disease. At first, doctors were mystified as to why the disease was clustered around this particular town.
This leads us back to Erich Traub, the German scientist who participated in research at Plum Island. Once they had the genetic footprint of the Lyme disease germ, researchers began to comb through disease cluster histories. It didn't make sense that Lyme would suddenly emerge, seemingly out of nowhere, in one town in rural Connecticut. Some of these investigators believe they found traces of borrelia in preserved insect and animal samples taken from nearby Shelter Island, as well as Long Island.

The samples dated from the late 1940s to the early 1950s—the time frame in which Erich Traub was infecting ticks on Plum Island.
Most interesting and troubling to birdwatchers and other outdoors-y types is the author’s investigation into the unproven but nonetheless highly suspicious connections between Plum Island and the sudden appearance of Dutch duck plague (1967), Lyme disease (1975) and West Nile virus (1999) on the East Coast. All of these disease outbreaks were first documented within a few miles of the labs.
IT HAS ALSO BEEN SAID THAT THE PLACE IS STILL SO CONTAMINATED THAT NO HUMANS SHOULD BE ALLOWED NEAR IT.
EVEN THE EPA HAS CITED THE ISLAND FOR ITS WASTE, AS HAS THE NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION.
EVERYBODY SEEMS TO WANT THE ISLAND CLEANED UP, BUT NO ONE SEEMS TO KNOW WHERE ALL THAT WASTE IS BURIED, NOR HOW TO GET IT OUT OF THE GROUND AND OFF THE ISLAND.
  

IN ITS PRIME, LAB 257 WAS INVOLVED DAILY WITH "HOT VIRUSES", LIVE, HIGHLY INFECTIVE ORGANISMS WITH WHICH THEY CONDUCTED "ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS".

A BIT OF HISTORY FOR THE PLUM ISLAND LAB 
(FEEL FREE TO SKIP THIS SEGMENT IF YOU REALLY DON'T GIVE A HOOT FOR HISTORY.)
Completed in 1911, Building 257 at Fort Terry,New York, designated the Combined Torpedo Storehouse and Cable Tanks building, and weapons were stored there.
But then, in 1952, the ARMY CHEMICAL CORPS (which had been called the Chemical Warfare Service) took over the facility and a thing called "anti-animal biological warfare testing" began there.
During World War 1, the U.S. had managed to develop a rather small arsenal (compared to today's standards) of CHEMICAL WEAPONS. Some of those, too, were stored on Plum Island, and the President and many in the general population, were nervous about that, wanted them destroyed, or maybe moved to a safer place away from populated areas.
Major General Amos Fries, the head of the Chemical Warfare Service for almost 9 years was convinced that plans to end the development of chemical weapons entailed a COMMUNIST PLOT, and he fought it with everything he had.
He was successful and, thanks to the pull, the power, of some whom he knew , including like-minded Congressmen, well known chemists and those who owned the chemical companies, Congress was influenced to NOT RATIFY the 1925 Geneva Protocol...they just said NO. So development of new and better chemical warfare marched on...on Plum Island.

In 1939, then President Roosevelt got more than a little pissed-off when the name change came up. He made that clear by stating:
"'I have a far more important objection to this change of name. It has been and is the policy of this Government to do everything in its power to outlaw the use of chemicals in warfare. Such use is inhuman and contrary to what modern civilization should stand for.

I am doing everything in my power to discourage the use of gases and other chemicals in any war between nations. While, unfortunately, the defensive necessities of the United States call for study of the use of chemicals in warfare, I do not want the Government of the United States to do anything to aggrandize or make permanent any special bureau of the Army or the Navy engaged in these studies. I hope the time will come when the Chemical Warfare Service can be entirely abolished.

To dignify this Service by calling it the "Chemical Corps" is, in my judgment, contrary to a sound public policy.'"

Maybe FDR's anger caused "bad ju-ju" for the Corps, but after that, it was plagued with "accidents" and those accidents showed us what they were up to...some of it, at least.
The Dugway sheep incident, March 1968, was one of several really big events that stirred the boiling pot of growing public furor against the corps. An open air spraying of VX was blamed for killing over 4,000 sheep near Dugway Proving Ground. The Army eventually settled the case and paid the ranchers.
Then, another incident involving Operation CHASE (Cut Holes and Sink 'Em) was also exposed. Operation CHASE sought to dump chemical weapons 250 miles (400 km) off the Florida coast, spurring concerns over the damage to the ocean environment and risk of chemical munitions washing up on shore.
DIDN'T THE CORPS, DIDN'T THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT KNOW THOSE RISKS? DIDN'T THEY CARE?
OBVIOUSLY  NOT.

The CORPS continued to be beleaguered  with bad press and with "mishaps". A 1969 incident, in which 23 soldiers and one Japanese civilian were exposed to SARIN on the island of Okinawa while cleaning sarin-filled bombs, created international outcry, while also revealing the presence of chemical munitions in Southeast Asia to the world.

Things gradually got better for the corps, it "restructured" itself, by 1969, had developed seven "standardized biological weapons": agents that cause anthrax, tularemia, brucellosis, Q-fever, VEE, and botulism. Maybe as an afterthought, Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B was produced as an "incapacitating agent"
The Corps marched on, it lived, it thrived, and beween 1979 and 1989 the Army established 28 active duty chemical defense companies.
Way to go, Team Gas and Hellfire! (one of its pet names in WW2).

The United States Army Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) School is the home of the Army's Chemical Corps, located at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. There are approximately 22,000 members of the Chemical Corps in the U.S. Army, spread among the Active, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.
The school trains officers and enlisted personnel in CBRN warfare and defense.
BACK TO THE LAB ITSELF
With remodeling and restructuring ongoing, the facility was updated in the 1950s, but an odd thing happened then...the USDA (United States Department of AGRICULTURE, yes, AGRICULTURE), took over at Fort Terry,
Fort Terry was officially transferred to the USDA on July 1, 1954, at the time scientists from the Bureau of Animal Industry were already working in Building 257.

Just FYI, that "bureau" was formed way, way back in 1884, was abolished by Secretary's Memorandum 1320, suppl. 4, on November 2, 1953, and reestablished as the Agricultural Research Service, The ARS currently the principal in-house research agency of the USDA.
Clever of our government to shuffle the cards and come up with this plan.
The citizens were much happier knowing their "protective service", the good old USDA, was watching over things out on Plum Island.
What could possibly be wrong with the USDA doing a little research, EVEN IF THAT RESEARCH WAS HIDDEN, WAS "TOP SECRET", AND STILL INVOLVED CHEMICAL WARFARE RESEARCH?
It wasn't like before...the USDA was testing on ANIMALS, cows, horses, and the like, right?

WAKE UP AND TAKE NOTES, CLASS, BECAUSE THE ARS MAINTAINS A VAST STORAGE OF CHEMICAL/BIO-WEAPONRY. AND THEY KNOW HOW TO MAKE USE OF IT!
HERE IS WHAT WE ARE SUPPOSED TO FIXATE UPON: "Microbial cultures are foundational and basic diagnostic methods used extensively as a research tool in molecular biology. Microbial culture collections focus on the acquisition, authentication, production, preservation, catalogueing and distribution of viable cultures of standard reference microorganisms, cell lines and other materials for research in microbial systematics.
Culture collection are also repositories of type strains."

WHAT THAT DOES NOT TELL US IS THAT EACH STRAIN OF ANY OF THESE CAN BE USED, AND SOME HAVE BEEN USED, AS WEAPONS IN WAR.
AND THE USDA HAS A CLOSET-FULL.
WE ARE TOLD THAT THE MAJORITY OF THESE CULTURES NOW "LIVE" IN MANASSAS, VIRGINIA., AND ARE HELD FOR US BY ...
ATCC , a private nonprofit organization in the biotechnology field whose mission focuses on the acquisition, authentication, production, preservation, development and distribution of standard reference microorganisms, cell lines and other materials for research in the life sciences. Established in 1914 as the American Type Culture Collection and originally incorporated by scientists in 1925.
ATCC ALSO STORES OVER 8 MILLION CLONED GENES, INCLUDING HUMAN GENES.
AND DISEASE VECTORS..."Vector-borne disease" is the term commonly used to describe an illness caused by an infectious microbe that is transmitted to people by blood-sucking insects.
18,000 strains of bacteria from 900 genera, as well as 2,000 different types of animal viruses and 1,000 plant viruses have been ISOLATED, STORED, AND ARE ALIVE AND WELL, THANKS, IN GOOD PART, TO THE RESEARCH AT THE LAB ON PLUM ISLAND, AND OTHERS LIKE IT.

AN IMPORTANT NOTE, PLEASE BE AWARE:
ATCC supplied Iraqi organizations, including Baghdad University, with several pathogens between 1985 and 1989. These include Bacillus anthracis (the causative agent of anthrax), Aspergillus fungal cultures producing the mycotoxin aflatoxin), Brucella melitensis (causing brucellosis), Clostridium botulinum, Clostridium perfringens, E. coli and Salmonella cholerae-suis. 

YES, THE U.S. CONGRESS APPROVED THIS SHARING WITH SADDAM HUSSEIN, THROUGH THE CHANNELS OF THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, IN THE NAME OF AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT...AND IRAQ GOT ENOUGH OF THESE STRAINS TO KILL AS MANY PEOPLE AS THEY CARED TO.
ASK THE KURDISH PEOPLE.
IT WAS ALL DOCUMENTED, ALL WELL-KNOWN, WASN'T REALLY "HIDDEN", JUST WASN'T ADVERTISED.
UCLA HAS A PAGE ABOUT THE CDC's INVOLVEMENT IN THAT AS WELL.
CLICK HERE TO READ THE DOCUMENT.
IT MAKES A BIT TOO LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT WE SENT SUCH OVER TO IRAQ, BUT I OFFER IT FOR THE SKEPTICS, WHO ABOUND.

In 2002 American forces in Afghanistan found a dossier of information about the Plum Island laboratory in the Kabul residence of Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood, a Western-educated nuclear physicist and former chairman of the Pakistan Nuclear Energy Commission who has been identified by American officials as an associate of Osama bin Laden.
But Plum Island has a major and unfixable problem: it's an easy target for terrorists, indeed a sitting duck - and, frankly, Long Island has room for only one big duck on the East End. In the wake of 9/11, the center, housing highly virulent disease agents a mile and a half off Long Island, constitutes a serious risk not just to New York, but also to Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, which are all within 100 miles of Plum Island.
Homeland Security knows that the outmoded laboratory, which it described as too "costly to maintain," is a problem. In the press release announcing the news, it highlighted "growing concerns about accidental or intentional introduction of foreign animal diseases into the country.

IT'S BUILDING.
THE WHOLE THING IS COMING FULL CIRCLE...

PLEASE TAKE NOTE AS WE CANNOT BUT IMAGINE HOW THIS ONE SMALL PLACE WHICH IS SO NEAR TO LARGE POPULATIONS, SO VERY NEAR TO ONE OF AMERICA'S MAJOR CITIES, SO UNPROTECTED, CAN BE USED TO WIPE OUT LARGE NUMBERS OF HUMAN BEINGS AND FOOD ANIMALS...WHETHER BY FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC TERRORISTS (LIKE HOMELAND SECURITY?).
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED BY COLUMBIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY'S "HOMELAND SECURITY NEWS WIRE" ON JULY 20, 2010...
The bio lab on 840-acre Plum Island, a mile-and-a-half off Long Island’s Orient Point, is a Biosafety level 4 facility — the only type of research lab authorized to handle diseases that are communicable between humans and animals and for which there is no known cure; from a boat, terrorists armed with shoulder-fired rockets would have a clear shot, or a plane could dive into the laboratory, dispersing deadly germs into an area from Massachusetts to New York; DHS has decided to build a new lab in Kansas to replace the aging Plum Island center, but some local politicians object, citing the local jobs that would be lost.
[As reported by Karl Grossman in the Huffington Post, ]
  • In 2002 U.S. Army commandos and CIA agents found a “dossier” containing “information on a place in New York called the Plum Island Animal Disease Center” in a raid on the Afghanistan residence of Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood, a nuclear physicist from Pakistan and an associate of Osama bin Laden.
  • In 2003 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported there is a substantial risk that “an adversary might try to steal pathogens” from the center and use them against people or animals in the United States. GAO noted that a camel pox strain researched at the center could be converted into “an agent as threatening as smallpox,” and the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus studied there could be “developed into a human biowarfare agent.”
Grossman writes that it can never be. “Plum Island sits exposed amid busy marine traffic lanes. The main Plum Island laboratory sits just behind a beach along which pass a line of boat traffic including ferries taking passengers between Orient Point and Connecticut,” he writes. From a boat terrorists armed with shoulder-fired rockets would have a clear shot, or a plane could dive into the laboratory, dispersing deadly germs into an area from Massachusetts to New York.
DHS has already chosen Manhattan, Kansas, as the location of new biolab to replace the aging Plum Island research facility (“DHS is searching for buyers for Plum Island facility,” 4 August 2009 HSNW), but New York politicians want the lab — and its jobs — to stay. In any event, it will take years to build the new lab.
The threat of a terrorist attack on Plum Island, sitting between Boston and New York City and just south of New London and Groton, Connecticut, remains. “Work on highly toxic pathogens should only be done at a heavily guarded facility inland, perhaps constructed underground — not on an island out in the open so close to this crowded area of the United States,” Grossman concludes.>>  

Is that the "set-up" being prepared in our media, the initial phase of everything coming undone?
WILL WE SEE PLUM ISLAND, LAB 257, BLOW UP IN OUR FACES?


AND REMEMBER, THEY ARE MOVING THE LAB TO KANSAS, TO KANSAS WHERE GREAT HERDS OF FOOD ANIMALS ARE RAISED FOR AMERICAN MARKETS.

ALSO REMEMBER THAT THERE ARE

At Fort Detrick, the USBWL consisted of various labs and divisions, including:
  • The Safety "S" Division, first to be activated (1943)
    • Biological Protection Branch
  • The Special Operations Division (1949–68), conducted hundreds of field tests of aerosolized simulants
  • The Crops Division (called "Plant Sciences Laboratories" after 1966), evaluated thousands of compounds for herbicidal activity (including Agent Orange; see Herbicidal warfare)
  • The Basic Science [Division?]
The USBWL was also a parent facility overseeing testing and production centers elsewhere, including:

Steve Erickson, director of the Citizens' Education Project in Salt Lake City, Utah said, IN ABOUT 2002, "This expansion of laboratory capacity within the Defense Department and other departments of government has been in the works for a number of years, probably dating to about 1995. Certainly, the intensity and speed of these developments is picked up since 9/11/2001. The last count we had was about 14 [labs] that were being proposed in various locations by any one of four Cabinet level departments within the US Government. There are some indications now that the National Institutes of Health will be backing off in terms of the numbers of Biological Safety Level Four laboratories, but intends instead to renovate and perhaps build additional Biological Level Three laboratories."

The Department of Energy wants to build a BSL-3 facility at its Los Alamos lab in New Mexico. On December 16th, the DOE released the final Environmental Assessment of plans to build a BSL-3 lab at Lawrence Livermore National Lab.
THIS IS A LIVE ANTHRAX LAB. 
SEE ALSO: http://www.nukewatch.org/media/more_media/01-00-02/01-03-02/University-President-Defends-Anthrax-Shipment.html
The draft environmental assessment for the proposed lab says that current plans call for the facility to handle the DNA and RNA of a wide array of organisms. The lab could also engage in the chemical separation of DNA, RNA and proteins, and in sample amplification, which the assessment defines as "the process to rapidly and significantly increase the number of microorganisms in a sample." The environmental assessment also states that "the proposed facility would have the unique capability within DOE/NNSA to perform aerosol studies to include challenges of rodents using infectious agents or biologically derived toxins (biotoxins)."

Prof. Barbara Hatch Rosenberg, Chair of the Working Group on Biological Weapons of the Federation of American Scientists, has said "when various types of weapons are being researched at the same place, it means that if there is any kind of oversight or investigation or inspection of one type, it puts at risk classified information about the others. And this is a reason why this government frequently objects to any kind of oversight. And this is also, in my view, a reason why different kinds of weapons research should be conducted at different locations, rather than piling them all in the same place."
WE MAY NEVER KNOW WHAT HAS "ESCAPED" LABS LIKE THE ONE ON PLUM ISLAND, BUT WE DO, MOST DEFINITELY, KNOW HOW SUCH LABS HAVE USED US AS HUMAN GUINEA PIGS BEFORE.
<
There were 456 cases of occupational infections acquired at Fort Detrick during the offensive biological program, at a rate of less than 10 infections per million hours worked. The rate of occupational infection was well within the contemporary standards of the National Safety Council, and below the rates reported from other laboratories. There were three fatalities due to occupationally acquired infections; two cases of anthrax in 1951 and 1958, and a case of viral encephalitis in 1964. The mortality rate was lower than those of other contemporary surveys of laboratory-acquired infections. There were 48 occupational infections and no fatalities reported from production and testing sites. The safety program included the development and use of new vaccines as well as engineering safety measures.



JUST WATCH THIS WEE PLACE ...THIS LITTLE-KNOWN AMERICAN "SECRET". 


OTHER RESOURCES:
http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?us_military_weapons_of_mass_destruction=us_military_biologicalWeapons&timeline=us_military_tmln

http://140.139.42.105/content/BioWarCourse/HX-3/HX-3.html  

ESPECIALLY THE FOLLOWING FILE:
http://140.139.42.105/content/BioWarCourse/HX-3/HX-3.html  


http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles/DVNS_CBW.htm 

AND AN "IFFY" SITE, IFFY BECAUSE IT SOMETIMES TENDS TO GO "OVER THE TOP" SANS PERFECT DOCUMENTATION...STILL, INFORMATIVE:
http://www.knowthelies.com/node/9589


NOTHING GOOD ON THE TELLY TONIGHT?
WATCH THIS?
OR WATCH HERE, IF THE YOUTUBE LINK DOES AWAY...
http://globalelite.tv/2013/10/16/shade-the-motion-picture/


I'M NOT ENDORSING ANY FILMS HERE, JUST POST THEM SO WE CAN EXERCISE OUR OWN MINDS, LET IN SOME NEW IDEAS, MAYBE...AND, AS ALWAYS, JUST THINK ABOUT THINGS IN A NON-BIASED, LOGICAL MANNER...
OR NOT..